Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 GBIF: Xanthogramma = Chrysotoxum
|
|
| Carnifex |
Posted on 23-05-2021 06:09
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1833 Joined: 23.06.15 |
the accepted name according to GBIF is Xanthogramma festiva (Linnaeus, 1758) and the synonym is Chrysotoxum festivum (Linnaeus, 1758). That can only be a mistake? https://www.gbif....es/4516839 Edited by Carnifex on 23-05-2021 06:09 Cheers, Lorin Font Color All requests are from the urban area of Vienna, if not otherwise stated. My Diptera observations (and other living forms) can be found here, and corrections or comments over there would also be appreciated. |
|
|
|
| Jan Maca |
Posted on 23-05-2021 15:26
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1113 Joined: 25.03.10 |
CZN 2001: Opinion 1982 (Case 3090): Musca arcuata Linnaeus, 1758 and M. festiva Linnaeus, 1758 (currently Chrysotoxum arcuatum and C. festivum) and M. citrofasciata De Geer, 1776 (currently Xanthogramma citrofasciatum) (Insecta, Diptera): specific names conserved by the designation of neotypes for M. arcuata and M. festiva. Bull. Zool. Nom. 58: 241-242 can probably explain this case. Enjoy, to me this case is outside of interest. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
