Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Phasia pusilla? --> confirmed
|
|
| Jann Wuebbenhorst |
Posted on 20-03-2022 21:57
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 541 Joined: 10.03.17 |
This was quite numerous in the first days of June 2021. Dry nutrient-poor meadow and wasteland, 02.06.2021 (Lüneburg, Niedersachsen, Germany) Jann Edited by Jann Wuebbenhorst on 03-11-2022 21:23 |
|
|
|
| Jann Wuebbenhorst |
Posted on 20-03-2022 21:57
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 541 Joined: 10.03.17 |
2nd |
|
|
|
| Jann Wuebbenhorst |
Posted on 20-03-2022 21:59
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 541 Joined: 10.03.17 |
3rd |
|
|
|
| guplox |
Posted on 21-03-2022 01:52
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 438 Joined: 09.02.18 |
I photographed a similar-looking Tachinidae in late June last year in east China, which I identify to the genus level as Phasia. |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 21-03-2022 07:47
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
please don’t post different specimens in one thread, it gets a mess rapidly (like here). The Luneburg specimen is Ph. cf. pusilla. If you can check whether the halter is yellow or dark, that would help. The Chinese one is clearly not Phasia, but Leucostoma or Calyptromyia. Theo |
|
|
|
| guplox |
Posted on 21-03-2022 07:56
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 438 Joined: 09.02.18 |
Thank you Theo for the correction! I simply mistook my specimen for a Phasia. You are absolutely right in pointing out that posting images of different specimens would cause a mess sooner or later. I'll refrain from doing that again! Thank you anyway.  |
|
|
|
| Jann Wuebbenhorst |
Posted on 21-03-2022 21:26
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 541 Joined: 10.03.17 |
The halteres are dark, so that confirms pusilla, I think. |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 22-03-2022 07:39
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
yes, I agree. as was expected. Theo |
|
|
|
| Jann Wuebbenhorst |
Posted on 22-03-2022 17:29
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 541 Joined: 10.03.17 |
Thank you Theo! |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
