Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Phaonia valida
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 30-03-2022 19:54
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
Fly near a compost heap. Satzvey, Eifel (West Germany), 30th April 2020. Could it be Hydrophoria linogrisea (Anthomyzidae)?
Edited by HTK on 31-03-2022 13:53 |
|
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 30-03-2022 19:55
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
Another picture. |
|
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 30-03-2022 19:56
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
One more picture. |
|
|
|
| John Carr |
Posted on 30-03-2022 21:52
|
 Member Location: Posts: 9773 Joined: 22.10.10 |
Family Muscidae |
 |
|
| Juergen Peters |
Posted on 30-03-2022 22:04
|
 Member Location: Posts: 13502 Joined: 11.09.04 |
Hello, I think, Phaonia (tuguriorum?). (And Hydrophoria would not be Anthomyzidae, but Anthomyiidae). Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
|
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 31-03-2022 00:01
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
Thank you, John and Jürgen, for your identifications and corrections. |
|
|
|
| eklans |
Posted on 31-03-2022 07:55
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3337 Joined: 11.11.18 |
Hi, 2 pairs of ac before scutellum, transverse veins only slightly infuscated, lower occiput with orange hairs: Phaonia valida, female
Greetings, Eric Kloeckner |
|
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 31-03-2022 13:52
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
Hi Eric, thank you very much for your determination to species level. |
|
|
|
| Juergen Peters |
Posted on 01-04-2022 20:21
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 13502 Joined: 11.09.04 |
eklans wrote:Phaonia valida, female Damn' early for that species. I typically find them here from summer to autumn... Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
|
|
|
| HTK |
Posted on 01-04-2022 22:04
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 226 Joined: 16.05.13 |
Hi Jürgen, your comment made me think – and check the file details of the original images. According to the file information the pictures were actually taken on September 6, 2021, which fits in perfectly with your observations. The date I entered was that listed on the caption of the images, I don’t know how the wrong date got there. Sorry for the confusion! It looks like your justified question mark can now be removed. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
