Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Tachinidae > Phasia
|
|
| Urs |
Posted on 28-01-2008 09:40
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1014 Joined: 09.03.06 |
Phasia auriga, female? Fotos: Switzerland, Wattwil SG, 750m NN, 31.August 07 on Eupatorium cannabinum Thank you for any help. |
 |
|
| Urs |
Posted on 28-01-2008 09:42
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1014 Joined: 09.03.06 |
Fot 2: |
|
|
|
| Urs |
Posted on 28-01-2008 09:43
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1014 Joined: 09.03.06 |
Foto 3: |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 28-01-2008 09:45
|
 Member Location: Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
no Phasia.. but Ectophasia sp. |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 28-01-2008 09:51
|
 Member Location: Posts: 5550 Joined: 02.03.05 |
No, Phasia sp it is. Look at wing venation. I leave the species to Theo.
Gabor Keresztes Japan Wildlife Gallery Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 28-01-2008 10:38
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
opsss... you are right! |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 28-01-2008 10:54
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
Phasia aurigera (male, I think). I didn't see at the first time the petiole.  |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 28-01-2008 17:40
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
First of all, it a male. Secondly, the golden crown on the thorax is extending to the front. Moreover, the face is distinctly projecting. So this is the male of Ph. aurulans, not to be confused with aurigera. Great pictures, species is generally not so common. Theo |
|
|
|
| Urs |
Posted on 29-01-2008 09:41
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1014 Joined: 09.03.06 |
Thank you for the help and the informations. Regards Urs |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
