Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Musca ?
|
|
| Perseus |
Posted on 21-03-2006 01:01
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 55 Joined: 11.08.05 |
Hello, This is a picture of a common fly from June 2005.  Is it Musca domestica, the Common House Fly? I suspect it is a near species, if it is not. Musca autumnalis was considered to be favourite ID. I hope I have got the type of fly correct as I am going on general impressions rather than specifics. It may seem silly, but I never took a look at pests under the magnifying glass when I was young, and now I cannot see so clearly without my digital camera. Cheers Andy Horton glaucus@... Adur Valley (West Sussex) Nature Notes http://www.glaucus.org.uk/Adur2006.html Adur Valley Nature Notes: March 2006 http://www.glaucus.org.uk/March2006.html |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 21-03-2006 17:40
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
the picture doesn't show. please cut and paste directlyl, apperently linking is not possible Theo |
|
|
|
| Perseus |
Posted on 22-03-2006 01:44
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 55 Joined: 11.08.05 |
The image is at: http://www.glaucus.org.uk/Fly013.jpg I have not worked out to upload quite yet. |
|
|
|
| Perseus |
Posted on 22-03-2006 20:41
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 55 Joined: 11.08.05 |
If nobody can see the image, how do I make it seeable? |
|
|
|
| Date |
Posted on 22-03-2006 21:08
|
 Member Location: Posts: 29 Joined: 24.10.04 |
Don't bother, I can see it. Cheers, Date |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 22-03-2006 21:27
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Can't be sure about ID, but it is NOT Musca domestica. It could very well be Musca autumnalis, however. best guess, I would say Theo zeegers |
|
|
|
| Perseus |
Posted on 31-03-2006 10:50
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 55 Joined: 11.08.05 |
Thanks for the replies. Glad you can see it. Too big for Musca domestica, although you cannot see this. I thought the best match was Musca autumnalis. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
