Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Which Chrysotoxum?
|
|
| Steve Makin |
Posted on 11-09-2008 10:28
|
 Member Location: Posts: 7 Joined: 10.08.08 |
On the 1st of July by the edge of a field near Great Brickhill, buckinghamshire, England. I was thinking Chrysotoxum cautum or maybe verralli. |
|
|
|
| Steve Makin |
Posted on 11-09-2008 10:32
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 7 Joined: 10.08.08 |
Maybe this time the photo will appear.... |
|
|
|
| Steve Makin |
Posted on 11-09-2008 10:34
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 7 Joined: 10.08.08 |
And another.... |
|
|
|
| Andre |
Posted on 11-09-2008 15:40
|
 Member Location: Posts: 2111 Joined: 18.07.04 |
cautum it is  |
 |
|
| Gerard Pennards |
Posted on 11-09-2008 19:01
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1914 Joined: 07.06.04 |
Nope, not cautum, on the second picture it's clearly visible that antennal segment 3 is shorter than segments 1 and 2 together. So it's Chrysotoxum verralli indeed, which also fits better it's general shape and color! greetings Greetings, Gerard Pennards |
|
|
|
| Steve Makin |
Posted on 11-09-2008 19:13
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 7 Joined: 10.08.08 |
Does this help? |
|
|
|
| Gerard Pennards |
Posted on 14-09-2008 16:39
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1914 Joined: 07.06.04 |
Hello Steve, Yes, i't proves my point. I took the liberty to work your picture a bit, you see antennal segments 1, 2 and 3. In cautum 3 should be as long as 1 and 2 together, which clearly isn't the case. 3 is much shorter than 1 and 2 combined. So it's a female Chrysotoxum verralli! Greetings Edited by Gerard Pennards on 14-09-2008 16:40 Greetings, Gerard Pennards |
|
|
|
| Steve Makin |
Posted on 16-09-2008 14:03
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 7 Joined: 10.08.08 |
Veralli it is, then. Thanks very much to both of you for your help. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.