Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Unknown fly
|
|
Ben Hamers |
Posted on 02-02-2005 16:47
|
Member Location: Posts: 735 Joined: 16.12.04 |
Hello, A very small one, this time. It's from August 2004 near Heerlen. Thanks in advance, Ben Edited by Ben Hamers on 21-05-2012 22:41 |
|
|
Gerard Pennards |
Posted on 03-02-2005 09:42
|
Member Location: Posts: 1914 Joined: 07.06.04 |
Hoi Ben, After looking and consulting Paul, we think that it is probably a Sciomyzidae, and maybe from the genus Pherbellia. The problem is that the body is somewhat too yellowish, and the wings too dark! But maybe that is just the way it looks from its position in the picture. By the way, you all see the big red blob between legs 2 and 3? That is a parasitic mite (probably family Trombidiidae says our mite expert Farid Faraji), which has attached itself with it's chelicera on the fly's body! Greetings, Edited by Gerard Pennards on 03-02-2005 09:47 Greetings, Gerard Pennards |
|
|
Ben Hamers |
Posted on 03-02-2005 11:28
|
Member Location: Posts: 735 Joined: 16.12.04 |
A complete team analyzing my fly, that's perfect. Thanks a lot, Ben |
|
|
Paul Beuk |
Posted on 03-02-2005 11:55
|
Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Just two questions that may help us decide whether we were right: 1. You mention 'very small'. A while ago you posted some other pictures of 'small flies' and one of them was a Psila. Many of us working on 'small flies' would not yet call that small. Do you perhaps remember the size of this fly in mm? 2. From the picture I think you did, but just checking: Did you use flash? That might explain the very pale face and the darkening of the wing (shadow). Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
Ben Hamers |
Posted on 03-02-2005 17:17
|
Member Location: Posts: 735 Joined: 16.12.04 |
The fly sure was smaller then Psila, wenn Psila was 7 mm, the Pherbellia must have been about 4 mm. Without my flash my life would be empty and meaningless. Ben |
|
Jump to Forum: |