Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 woodlice from E Romania
|
|
| Alexandru Pintilioaie |
Posted on 03-03-2010 14:57
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 947 Joined: 04.02.10 |
date: 28.02.2010 size: ~ 1 cm  |
|
|
|
| nielsyese |
Posted on 03-03-2010 16:55
|
 Member Location: Posts: 2318 Joined: 13.02.09 |
I'm pretty sure this is Oniscus asellus |
|
|
|
| Alexandru Pintilioaie |
Posted on 03-03-2010 17:14
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 947 Joined: 04.02.10 |
Thanks a lot for help ! |
|
|
|
| John Bratton |
Posted on 04-03-2010 19:41
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 638 Joined: 17.10.06 |
It doesn't look right for Oniscus asellus, but I can't tell you what it is. A non-British species I think. |
|
|
|
| John Bratton |
Posted on 05-03-2010 17:37
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 638 Joined: 17.10.06 |
The attached is Oniscus asellus, borrowed from ispot.org.uk. John |
|
|
|
| pwalter |
Posted on 05-03-2010 19:16
|
 Member Location: Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Some Trachelipodidae maybe?
Walter Pfliegler - Amateur Nature Photographer from Hungary (and molecular biologist) |
|
|
|
| Alexandru Pintilioaie |
Posted on 05-03-2010 19:23
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 947 Joined: 04.02.10 |
I checked on Fauna Europaea and i saw that Oniscus asellus is present here in Romania....It is possible to get a genus for this woodlice? Thx you all for the reply  |
|
|
|
| libor |
Posted on 05-03-2010 20:15
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1266 Joined: 30.05.09 |
I am not expert, but what about Cylisticus convexus? Libor |
|
|
|
| nielsyese |
Posted on 05-03-2010 20:32
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2318 Joined: 13.02.09 |
Cylisticus convexus has very long uropodes. |
|
|
|
| nielsyese |
Posted on 06-03-2010 06:43
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2318 Joined: 13.02.09 |
I asked an expert: He said this is probably Trachelipus rathkii, but he couldnt'exclude T. nodulosus and he didn't know T. dimorphus and T. radui. Other Trachelipus are excluded. So there's your answer |
|
|
|
| Alexandru Pintilioaie |
Posted on 06-03-2010 06:57
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 947 Joined: 04.02.10 |
Many thanks Nielsyese |
|
|
|
| pwalter |
Posted on 06-03-2010 11:42
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Hi, for an ID You should always photograph the underside of the animal also. And the head from front. That's more or less the only way to get a species-name. Regards, Walter Walter Pfliegler - Amateur Nature Photographer from Hungary (and molecular biologist) |
|
|
|
| Alexandru Pintilioaie |
Posted on 06-03-2010 12:03
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 947 Joined: 04.02.10 |
Thank you for the info, i didn't know that  |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.