Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Haematopota sp.
|
|
| Ben Hamers |
Posted on 19-06-2005 21:20
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 735 Joined: 16.12.04 |
Good evening, I saw this fly last week in Heerlen. Is the thickened first part of the antennae enough reason to call it Haematopota crassicornis ? Thanks, Ben Edited by Ben Hamers on 23-05-2012 19:09 |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 20-06-2005 15:16
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Hi Ben, No, this feature in only significant in the female sex. This looks to me like a male (eyes meeting on another). Can you confirm that ? Theo Zeegers |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 20-06-2005 15:17
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
By the way, just noticed that the third antennal segment is orange at base. In crassicornis, it is completely black. Therefore, this cannot be crassicornis. Most likely it is a male of Haematopota pluvialis. Theo Zeegers |
|
|
|
| Ben Hamers |
Posted on 20-06-2005 16:15
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 735 Joined: 16.12.04 |
Thanks Theo, It was a male indeed, my second Haematopota-male in seven years. I hope this sounds as a good excuse for giving it the wrong name. Ben |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
