Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 22

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,945
· Newest Member: millenin
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
· Unknown Stratiomyida...
· Milichiidae?->Chloro...
· Heleomyzidae ?
· Ceratopogonidae (Ton...
· Bibionidae: Bibio re...
Hottest Threads
No Threads created
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· piros13 weeks
· Bernd Rotten...13 weeks
· Marcello29 weeks
· Paul Beuk60 weeks
· JWV74 weeks
· Nosferatumyia86 weeks
· daveb2186 weeks
· guplox86 weeks
· ESant86 weeks
· Jan Maca86 weeks
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info » Identification queries » Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Potamia littoralis, Muscidae, Hungary, March 2007
Xespok
I collected this specimen (in a very bad condition) and try to key it. If I had not done a major mistake this should be a Phaonia sp, it has the Phaonia bristle on the hind leg. Does not look like one though.
Edited by Xespok on 16-04-2008 20:14
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Xespok
Another view.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Xespok
And a third view.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Nikita Vikhrev
Gabor, my test it is Anthomyiidae, may be Hylemyza.
Nikita
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
Xespok
Thx Nikita, I was really looking for the anal vein, whether it reaches the margin of the wing or not. On the specimen it is not absolutely clear, it reaches very far, but maybe not to the very edge. On the other hand the body is quite slim, so Anthomyiidae is a good idea. This is one of the largest Anthomyiids then.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Nikita Vikhrev
Hylemyza is a large one - about 8mm.
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
Xespok
Hylemyza partita should be the only species in Hungary. Your image of H. partita in the gallery, however, looks slightly different from my images, not the different eye shapes for example. But maybe I am fooled by the different angles of the photos.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Nikita Vikhrev
Gabor,
I do not at all insist on Hylemyza. You have specimen in your hand, I'm waiting for your result...
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
Xespok
But I have nothing on Anthomyiidae (and the specimen is in really bad shape.)

Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Susan R Walter
Gabor

Michael Ackland will send you his Anthomyiidae key if you contact him. I don't have his email address at work, but could send it to you from home. I know Nikita has his key, so if he is online before me, he could give you the address.

I find that the anal vein often doesn't really reach the margin. The distinction is really a question of whether it is a relatively long anal vein or a relatively short one. I find it is helpful to also check the underneath of the scutellum. Many anthos have sparse small stiff downward pointing hairs around the bottom edge of the scutellum and muscids never have this feature. See http://www.nku.ed...milies.htm for some helpful comparison closeups.
Susan
 
http://loirenature.blogspot.com/
crex
Could Michael Ackland (mackland [at] btinternet [dot] com) be persuaded to place the key on diptera.info?
 
Susan R Walter
Crex

I don't know. I have corresponded a couple of times with Michael Ackland, but I do not know him personally. Perhaps Paul or someone on the forum who does know him could ask?
Susan
 
http://loirenature.blogspot.com/
Xespok
I now have some literature, so I'll try to do my best.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Stephane Lebrun
I came across this thread searching for Hylemya, and this fly attracted my attention. The strong frontal bristles reaching up to the ocelar triangle made me think about Potamia, Muscidae (a feature of the genus). The rather large calypters and the 4 dc speaks more for Muscidae as well. That would explain also the Phaonia bristle, since it was formerly in Phaonia, then in Dendrophaonia.
So, I think it's Potamia littoralis.
Nikita found it four months later, and if you watch in the gallery, they're quite identical in profile view !
Edited by Stephane Lebrun on 23-02-2008 00:09
Stephane.
 
Xespok
Thx Stephane. I always felt rather uneasy this being an Anthomyiid fly. The fly has the typical Azeliinae jizz.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Michael Ackland
Could be Trichops (Muscidae). I do not think it is Anthomyiidae, because the hind metatarsus does not seem to have a basal ventral seta, present in nearly all anthos. The lower calypter looks large, and the profile of the head in one photo has frontal setae on whole length. Also the hind tibia shows 4-5 av setae. A good character for Trichops is the presence of setulae on the hind coxae (inner margin) never present in anthos. Unfortunately definitive charactersa for anthos are not generally visible in general photos, i.e. number of dorsocentrals, anal vein length, leg chaetotaxy, aristal hair length etc. (Always out of focus). I suggest you capture the specimen, and use my keys, now available on the tachinid web site. Trichops species are very similar to some anthos in general appearence especially if slim species.
 
Xespok
Michael, thx for the int? Is it Chris Raper's site that you refer to as the Tachinid web site?
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Michael Ackland
Yes. tachinidae.org.uk
Click on Tachinidae and down to Anthomyiidae
 
jorgemotalmeida
Smile Rise all Anthomyiids posts. Grin
I will post photos in 2 hours from Anthomyiids...
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Nikita Vikhrev
I agree with Stephane, Potamia littoralis seems solve all questions.
Nikita

Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Graphomya maculata female (Muscidae) Diptera (adults) 3 14-02-2024 20:42
Graphomya maculata (Muscidae) Diptera (adults) 2 12-02-2024 20:09
Muscidae - Helina sp.? Diptera (adults) 4 12-02-2024 18:43
Muscidae Diptera (adults) 5 11-02-2024 11:11
Muscidae - Helina (but which species?) Diptera (adults) 4 09-02-2024 19:01
Date and time
16 October 2025 17:32
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

07.10.22 11:55
Can any1 help out with a pdf copy of 1941 Hammer. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105; thank you

Render time: 2.62 seconds | 198,565,872 unique visits