 Agathomyia viduella? May 22, 2007
|
|
| Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 24-05-2007 10:43
|
 Member Location: Posts: 3303 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Swept from low vegetation in a mixed forest. Size 4 to 4.5 mm. R without bristles, Mesonotum and abdomen black, tibiae II with 1 strong bristle, 1st segment of tarsi II without strong bristles, so a male of Agathomyia viduella? |
|
|
|
| Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 24-05-2007 10:44
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3303 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Very similar but smaller (3 mm) and with black halteres - a female? Only dead specimen, sorry... |
|
|
|
| Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 14-06-2007 18:44
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3303 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Based on results of subsequent collecting, I think I missed bristles on R1 somehow so the one with yellow halteres is most probably a male of Callomyia amoena, and the male with black halteres was a different species of Callomyia (speciosa?). |
|
|
|
| Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 15-06-2007 12:36
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3303 Joined: 17.10.05 |
A correction/reversion: Anatoly Shatalkin confirmed that both depicted flies are Agathomyia. |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 15-06-2007 13:46
|
 Member Location: Posts: 9193 Joined: 24.05.05 |
I'm sorry. I told to Black in telephon conversation that Shatalkin told that it is another genus. But Shatalkin meaned that it is not Agathomyia, but Callomyia! So, post from 14-06-2007 19:44 - is with correct ID! Nikita Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 15-06-2007 14:35
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 3303 Joined: 17.10.05 |
OK so no reversion, it's Callomyia. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
