 Long legs and curious eyes
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 15-08-2007 17:36
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Hello, This long-legged Dipter has curious eyes, which are joined behind the antennas, if I see correctly. Any idea ? Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 15-08-2007 18:16
|
 Member Location: Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
Hybotidae |
 |
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 15-08-2007 18:50
|
 Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Perhaps Trichinomyia flavipes.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 15-08-2007 20:54
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Paul, thanks a lot. Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| igor |
Posted on 29-08-2007 00:04
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 288 Joined: 23.11.06 |
See for real Trichinomyia flavipes Black's post on 21-08-2007 19:43. |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 29-08-2007 07:45
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Hello, igor wrote: See for real Trichinomyia flavipes Black's post on 21-08-2007 19:43. Here is the link to the post : http://www.dipter...post_35934 On Black's pictures, the legs are clearly yellow or even transparent. The back legs are clearly black in my case. For the forelegs, it must be an artifact of the sun (backlighting). Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 29-08-2007 07:48
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Well, maybe a Trichina rather than a Trichinomyia? Igor?
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 29-08-2007 09:37
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Rhamphomyia (Empididae)? Too bad the wing venation of badly out of focus. Kahis |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 29-08-2007 13:45
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Hello, I have another picture. I'll check whether the wing veination is clearer. Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 29-08-2007 19:53
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
I think in Rhamphomyia the way the eyes meet on the frons would be different (for xample, over a shorter distance) and that we would be able to see something of the rostrum (not here) and that we would see some longer setae on the legs.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 29-08-2007 20:51
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
I notice that a copy of this pic in the Gallery has been identified as Trichinomyia by Igor. No, not that Igor, the other Igor 
Kahis |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 29-08-2007 20:51
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Hello, Well, sorry, nothing better about the wing. Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| igor |
Posted on 29-08-2007 21:08
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 288 Joined: 23.11.06 |
Dear Pierre, The size of this fly is a bit strange (8 mm). Is it correct? I do not know any Trichinomyia, Trichina or Holoclera (that this fly really resembles) with such a big size. The wing venation would be best solution but some other structures could also be helpful. So, maybe you could post your second image? Igor |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 30-08-2007 07:34
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Dear Igor, About the size: it may be over-estimated. Maybe 5-7mm would be more correct. I'll post below a photo of the whole leaf. Maybe someone will recognize the plant and know what is the size of the "peaks". I post below the other photo. I hope it can help. Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 30-08-2007 07:35
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Here is the other photo. Thinking twice about it, I thinkthis was a hazeltree. Edited by pierred on 30-08-2007 07:40 Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| Adrian |
Posted on 30-08-2007 08:13
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 69 Joined: 05.01.07 |
To me it has the 'jiz' of Rhamphomyia subgenus Holoclera. But:- so many characters can't be seen well in the image. I can't see anything of the mouthparts and presume they are hidden in this view. Also, I think(?) I can make out acr setae which would rule out the obvious Holoclera cheers Adrian |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 30-08-2007 10:12
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
How about Bicellaria?
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Adrian |
Posted on 30-08-2007 10:42
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 69 Joined: 05.01.07 |
Know what you mean but the legs are quite slender and with weak chaetae so it would probably have to be B. simplicipes. In Bicellaria the thorax is rather strongly (often very strongly) arched and this is clearly not the case in this image. Also, to best of my knowledge there are not any European Bicellaria with paler bases to the legs (but I may be wrong). If I noticed it in a British woodland I would call it R. nigripennis cheers Adrian |
|
|
|
| igor |
Posted on 30-08-2007 11:33
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 288 Joined: 23.11.06 |
Hi Adrian, This is not R. nigripennis. I have some doubts about the genus of this image but enyway it may be something undescribed that is not too big surprise for the region it was taken. All the best, Igor |
|
|
|
| pierred |
Posted on 31-08-2007 07:31
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Well, even if we end with a question mark as identification, this was an interesting thread... Thanks to all. Pierre Duhem |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
