Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Tachinid?
|
|
| Cor Zonneveld |
Posted on 18-08-2007 20:27
|
 Member Location: Posts: 840 Joined: 14.10.06 |
I saw this rather smallish (say 5 mm) fly in the Dutch coastal dunes. This is my best photograph, I hope it is good enough for an ID (or close to...) The flower it is on is Jacobaea vulgaris, which has rather small flower heads. Open dunes, with canals running through the area. Coniferous and deciduous forst never too far away. I thought it might be a Tachinidae, although the antennae are rather unimpressive...but may be that's feature only in my imagination! Edited by Cor Zonneveld on 18-08-2007 20:29 Thanks for your attention Cor Zonneveld |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 18-08-2007 20:30
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
NO, a Miltogramminae (Sarcophagidae), but the mistake is often made. It's the genus Miltogramma itself, and given the locality (I know, this is cheating) it can only be M. germari Theo |
|
|
|
| Cor Zonneveld |
Posted on 18-08-2007 20:43
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 840 Joined: 14.10.06 |
Thanks! I know, this is cheating I'm not sure I agree. I would say: any information that adds to an ID is valid. Of course, if the additional info is vital, the ID does not follow from the photo alone. But I'm quite content with using additional info (else, why presenting it?) Many butterfly species (my frame of reference) can be most easily IDed on the basis of location and altitude! Edited by Cor Zonneveld on 18-08-2007 20:43 Thanks for your attention Cor Zonneveld |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 19-08-2007 13:18
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 18446 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I agree What I meant with cheating, is that I have a database of dutch Miltogramminae, whereas others don't. That's cheating (after hard work). Theo |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
