Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Xysticus ID, please
|
|
| treebeard |
Posted on 01-05-2018 06:03
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 601 Joined: 13.08.13 |
Banska Bystrica, 29.04.2018, field road, 500 m.a.s.l. Quite a large specimen (larger than "normal" Xysticus sp.), it lacks apattern on abdomen typical for the most of Xysticus species. Thank you in advance Matej Edited by treebeard on 01-05-2018 06:17 |
|
|
|
| treebeard |
Posted on 01-05-2018 06:07
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 601 Joined: 13.08.13 |
on this picture, the rear part of cephalothorax is visible - a pale V-shaped spot |
|
|
|
| treebeard |
Posted on 01-05-2018 06:08
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 601 Joined: 13.08.13 |
and a "portrait" |
|
|
|
| johnes81 |
Posted on 11-05-2018 12:03
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
I only id spiders by genitalia if they are not easily recognized. Xysticus are difficult and prone to error in judgement. Thus, i am just offering an opinion: I think that Xysticus acerbus is a possibility. Again, i have trouble identifying certain spiders by photo. I always id most Xysticus by genitalia. John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
|
| Juergen Peters |
Posted on 11-05-2018 20:16
|
 Member Location: Posts: 13502 Joined: 11.09.04 |
Hello, johnes81 wrote: I think that Xysticus acerbus is a possibility. very likely. Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
 |
|
| treebeard |
Posted on 11-05-2018 20:29
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 601 Joined: 13.08.13 |
Thanks both of you |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
