Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Pipizella viduata? = yes
|
|
| johnes81 |
Posted on 04-07-2018 11:40
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
male - 6.3mm - Berlin - May 2018 I am hoping that someone can confirm at least the genus Pipizella. I don't have keys for many Syrphidae. I also request any tips of where to find keys. I usually just glance at photos and try to memorize appearance/morphology. I thought it was Cheilosia until i looked at it a bit closer. I quickly browsed the gallery and this looks very similar to Pipizella viduata. https://diptera.i...to_id=4312 I can match genitalia if someone can provide drawings. I see that nine Pipizella are recorded for Germany, four of which are recorded for Berlin (according to the Entomologische Gesellschaft Berlin). I have read about Speight but i cannot find pdf files. Anyone able to help? I would like keys to genera, keys to Cheilosia especially. Thank you for your time, John Edited by johnes81 on 19-07-2018 17:50 John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
|
| johnes81 |
Posted on 04-07-2018 12:19
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
Hello Friends, I am sorry about requesting keys for Pipizella. I just found a pdf with drawings of genitalia: Revision of the West-Palaearctic species of Pipizella Jeroen van Steenis and Jan A.W. Lucas I didn't see this before. I guess that i overlooked it in the search results. So I just need a confirmation of the genus please. Thank you. John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
|
| helge |
Posted on 06-07-2018 04:25
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1322 Joined: 10.02.16 |
HI John and Nini, yes genus is correct! best wishes, Helge |
|
|
|
| johnes81 |
Posted on 07-07-2018 15:45
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
Dankeschön, Helge 
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
|
| johnes81 |
Posted on 19-07-2018 17:54
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
Today i've dissected the specimen and i can confirm P. viduata. I'm surprised that i was able to id it by photo because most text implies that genitalia is required. Very interesting. Bravo! Helge for recognizing this specimen. I've never seen a Pipizella before, so i wasn't sure about my tentative id. Anyway, the genitalia is a perfect match to drawings. Thank you for your time, John Edited by johnes81 on 19-07-2018 17:54 John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
|
| helge |
Posted on 19-07-2018 19:26
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 1322 Joined: 10.02.16 |
 fine John! |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.