Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 5

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,945
· Newest Member: millenin
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
· Unknown Stratiomyida...
· Milichiidae?->Chloro...
· Heleomyzidae ?
· Ceratopogonidae (Ton...
· Bibionidae: Bibio re...
Hottest Threads
No Threads created
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Marcello 4 weeks
· Paul Beuk34 weeks
· JWV48 weeks
· Nosferatumyia60 weeks
· daveb2160 weeks
· guplox60 weeks
· ESant60 weeks
· Jan Maca60 weeks
· libor60 weeks
· Reimund Ley60 weeks
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info » Family forums » Asilidae Forum
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Stenopogon elongatus or S. junceus ♂? => S. junceus
Armen Seropian
Georgia, Tbilisi, 07.VIII.2019.

According to Richter (1968) "Asilidae of Caucasus", S. elongatus has red palpi, while S. junceus has black ones. And on the contary, the key given in Van den Broek et al (2017). "Stenopogon heteroneurus (Macquart, 1838), a new species of the genus Stenopogon Loew, 1847 for the Iberian Peninsula and Europe (Diptera: Brachycera: Asilidae)" says S. elongatus has black palpi, while S. junceus has the red ones. I'm a bit confused.

Can experts determine the species given on the photo below? (click the link to view the high resolution pic). Or maybe it's even Stenopogon obliteratus, known from Tbilisi (Richter (1968))

http://www.picz.g...553642.jpg
Edited by Armen Seropian on 10-08-2019 18:03
 
Armen Seropian
Ok, here's the pic of the wing - r5 and m3 open, so it's not S. elongatus according to Van den Broek et al (2017) (m3 should be closed and stalcked).
Edited by Armen Seropian on 08-08-2019 19:01
 
Piluca_Alvarez
Hi, Armen Smile

No wonder you get confused. There are mistakes in the literature all over the place. It took us ages to put the correct pieces of the puzzle together. But you can trust the key on van den Broek & Álvarez Fidalgo (2017). The illustrated S. junceus is the holotype, and has reddish palpi and open m3. The S. elongatus wasn't a type specimen but came for an area where S. elongatus is present for sure. It was IDed by M. Hradsky and fits the original description very nicely.

And beware of the wing illustrations in Séguy (1927). The wing 149 is labeled as junceus and it is heteroneurus. And the wing 150 is labeled as elongatus while it is the real junceus. We seriously doubt that elongatus is present either in France or Spain. All points out to misidentifications using this work. If anybody knows of any confirmed or convincing record of elongatus from France or Spain, we would love to know Smile

Regarding your fly, I cannot tell you something definitive at the moment, but it is NOT elongatus (but you already know that!). Unfortunately, I cannot read Russian and cannot use the key by Richter (1968). Hope Reinoud sees this thread and gives his opinion. He might have got the description translated by now Wink

All in all, it might be S. junceus (what I can see more or less fits, but that the wing veins should be paler). However, this group of species is in a taxonomic mess in Spain, and most likely the situation is similar in the rest of Europe.
Edited by Piluca_Alvarez on 09-08-2019 15:38
 
Armen Seropian
Hi Piluca!
Thanks for response and clarifying the situation with descriptions Smile

I'll attach pics of genitalia of the very specimen, hope it'll be enough for species determination.
Edited by Armen Seropian on 09-08-2019 20:22
 
Piluca_Alvarez
Great pictures!! Smile

In my humble opinion, your creature is a lot closer to S. junceus than S. obliteratus Smile And in fact, that genitalia is very similar to some specimens from the group collected in Spain (junceus/cervinus). Unless there are more species to be considered in your area, I think you can name your creature S. junceus rather safely. At least, till more is known about this group of species.
 
Armen Seropian
Great!
Thank you, Piluca! Smile
Could you tell me where I can find S. junceus genitalia drawings? Cause I can't trust Richter's drawing because of the faulse description.
 
Piluca_Alvarez
Armen, check your Private Messages box, please Wink
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Stenopogon ochripes (?), Catalunya (Spain) Asilidae Forum 1 13-07-2023 11:55
From Cadiz (Spain) -> Stenopogon cf. cervinus/junceus Asilidae Forum 7 14-09-2022 20:51
Asilidae NW Greece => Stenopogon sp. (female) Asilidae Forum 5 19-07-2022 22:14
Black and red Asilidae Morocco (2) -->> Stenopogon iphis Asilidae Forum 3 08-06-2022 18:51
Stenopogon sabaudus ? Asilidae Forum 1 16-06-2021 13:37
Date and time
21 April 2025 00:20
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

07.10.22 11:55
Can any1 help out with a pdf copy of 1941 Hammer. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105; thank you

Render time: 2.54 seconds | 194,216,721 unique visits