Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Chamaepsila => C. atra
|
|
| RamiP |
Posted on 09-06-2020 17:16
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
9.6.20 in Jyväskylä, Finland atra or nigra or...? 
Edited by RamiP on 12-06-2020 13:39 |
 |
|
| RamiP |
Posted on 09-06-2020 17:17
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
2 |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 12-06-2020 10:20
|
 Super Administrator Location: Posts: 19208 Joined: 11.05.04 |
With apparently four pairs of dc I would suggest Chamaepsila atra.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| RamiP |
Posted on 12-06-2020 13:38
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
Thanks Paul It was my wish  Raimo |
|
|
|
| Jocelyn Claude |
Posted on 22-09-2022 11:55
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 45 Joined: 29.08.22 |
H, interesting case as black Chamaepsila are difficult! I don't quite agree with Cha. atra, the latter must have 4dc whereas here there are obviously 3. Also: Tibia yellow and tarsus yellow but last tarsus dark. Femur black with pale knee. Body bristles brown to black. 3 dorsocentral (dc), many specimens have other dc but always shorter (1/2) than the three posterior ones. Wings hyaline => Chamaepsila nigra (Fallén, 1820) Although there are other species in this group, Cha. atra and nigra are quite hard to separate, examination of genitalia can remove any doubts. JOcelyn |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.