Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Parasyrphus vittiger
|
|
| dipdip |
Posted on 05-11-2007 21:48
|
 Member Location: Posts: 356 Joined: 17.12.05 |
... I think - Am I right? With regards Maja |
|
|
|
| dipdip |
Posted on 05-11-2007 22:04
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 356 Joined: 17.12.05 |
And this one should be P.lineolus. by Maja |
|
|
|
| Gisela Merkel-Wallner |
Posted on 06-11-2007 22:49
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 47 Joined: 05.07.05 |
Dear Meja, I don?t see any difference between the pictures. I think it is all Parasyrphus cf. lineolus. Gisela |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 06-11-2007 23:10
|
 Member Location: Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Gisela Merkel-Wallner wrote: I don?t see any difference between the pictures. I think it is all Parasyrphus cf. lineolus. Look at the colour of the third pair of legs 
Kahis |
 |
|
| Stephane Lebrun |
Posted on 06-11-2007 23:19
|
 Member Location: Posts: 8248 Joined: 03.03.07 |
Hello, I think Maja is right. At least there is some differences, those separating the two species : front tarsus yellow with only segments 4 and 5 black + hind tibia pale basaly and apicaly for P. vittiger, front tarsus entirely and hind tibia almost entirely black for P. lineolus. Edited by Stephane Lebrun on 06-11-2007 23:35 Stephane. |
|
|
|
| dipdip |
Posted on 07-11-2007 09:42
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 356 Joined: 17.12.05 |
Hello I think in nature the differnence is easier visible: P. vittiger is a dark little animal and as van Veen describes it stouter than P. lineolus. Thank you very much for helping! With regards Maja |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
