#17
Oh, Reinoud thank you very much
Now some pictures, where the exact type of identification is problematic. But maybe some will come to identify the tribe ..
1. http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?pos=-1574
2. http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?pos=-3189
#18
I looked at all pictures in gallery : )
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?pos=-1574 = Machimus cf rusticus male
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?pos=-3189 = Machimus rusticus male
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=9 = Female Dioctria cothurnata
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=6 = male Tolmerus cingulatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=2 = Dioctria cf linearis D. rufipes has a very large antennal knob
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=11 = male Tolmerus cingulatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=14 = male Neoitamus socius
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=18 = also female Didysmachus picipes Tip: shape of ovipositor and AC bristles before transverse suture
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=19 = Another male Tolmerus cingulatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=20 = Male Tolmerus cf cowini Looks very similar like T. cingulatus but the backside of front thighs has not the red stripe from the basis to top, just an apical ring of red.
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=24 = Female Choerades gilva. Shape of proboscis Andrenosoma is different, shorter more round and pointed slightly upward.
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=27 = Another male Tolmerus cingulatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=28 = a female Tolmerus cingulatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=31 = a female Neoitamus cothurnatus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=38 Probably Pamponerus cf germanicus
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=39 Probably male Neoitamus socius
http://www.macrogamta.lt/e107_plugins/coppermine_menu/displayimage.php?album=98&pos=40 = Male Lasiopogon cinctus
Please note the addition of CF it means comparison is needed in other words it could be a different but similar species.
#19
Reinould,
very happy that I got help from you !!
There is one problem, on the web address. In the gallery, the technical nuances of the site given your web address is not correct.
The correct address is URL (ADRESS):
Would you like to identify the species according to this new address?