Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Xanthogramma dives or stackelbergi female?
#1
Copenhagen, Denmark, june 12, 2012.
Referring to this articke http://www.entomohelvetica.ch/pdf/ausgabe3/139_145_Spight_BUCH.pdf X. dives is acceptet as a separate species different from X. stackelbergi (and pedissequum).
The tip of the forewings ar darkened/infuscated, and the shape of the median, Black longitudinal stripe on frons indicate X. dives.
I called it X. stackelbergi because the staus of X. dives as a separate species was still uncertain in the Sweedish "nationalnycken" I used.
Thanks in adwance
#3
I would say, considering the country,
dives/pedissequum . dives appears restricted to italy.
#4
ValerioW wrote:
I would say, considering the country, dives/pedissequum . dives appears restricted to italy.
The abdominal membrane between each tergite and sternite is entirely yellow, except for between tergite and sternite 1 and tergite and sternite 2, where there is a broad,distinct, dark-grey band.
This make X. pedissequum impossible, as I understand it.
According to the Swiss article in the link neither X. stackelbergi nor pedissequum have darkened vingtips.
#5
'Impossible' is a great word, too big for this still debated issue.
dives should have darkened wing tips, as your specimen has.
#6
Its a female of X. dives which is quite commune in Central Europe.
#7
Piet Nord wrote:
Its a female of X. dives which is quite commune in Central Europe.
That it matches with (latest, not old, that didn't mention wing tip's darkening)
dives ' descriptions is smooth and clear. Matter is that officially
dives is only in the checklist of non-insular Italy, and for sure not in Germany or Netherlands or Denmark. Why there's a similar gap? I think that this "wing's apex darkened"
Xanthogramma stackelbergi/pedissequum like is widespread, but there's no consensus yet about its detachment from the other two. Anyways, considering its particular traits (hind leg, wing's apex etc.), it appears to have dignity as independent species.
#8
Ruth, I just noticed that this photo was already in the diptera.info gallery. And I also see you put another
dives/stackelbergi in the gallery, which actually cannot be fixed, considering an unchecked wing.
#9
Yes, the male is discussed in this thread http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=7&thread_id=32554&pid=145396#post_145396.
A slight darkening on t´he wing-tip