Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 3

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,945
· Newest Member: millenin
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
· Unknown Stratiomyida...
· Milichiidae?->Chloro...
· Heleomyzidae ?
· Ceratopogonidae (Ton...
· Bibionidae: Bibio re...
Hottest Threads
No Threads created
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Marcello16 weeks
· Paul Beuk46 weeks
· JWV60 weeks
· Nosferatumyia72 weeks
· daveb2172 weeks
· guplox72 weeks
· ESant72 weeks
· Jan Maca72 weeks
· libor72 weeks
· Reimund Ley72 weeks
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info » Identification queries » Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Rhagio strigosus?
Juergen Peters
Hello!

These Rhagionids numerously inhabited a tree trunk in our garden today (Germany). Is this Rhagio strigosus? Thanks in advance!


www.foto-upload.de/diptera/060731/Rhagio_cf_strigosus_M1.jpg
www.foto-upload.de/diptera/060731/Rhagio_cf_strigosus_M2.jpg
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Tony Irwin
Could be, but it is difficult to separate male strigosus from scolopaceus. Also there is another species, latipennis that occurs in Germany. In this species the wings are rather broader than the others, and this may be what you have photographed. It is difficult to tell from the angle of the shot. Sad I only have scolopaceus in my collection, so perhaps someone with all the species can compare and give you a better answer! Smile
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Juergen Peters
Hello Tony,

thanks for your reply!

Tony Irwin wrote:
Could be, but it is difficult to separate male strigosus from scolopaceus.


My first thought was indeed R. scolopaceus, but isn't that a spring species? They were numerous here, but have disappeared some weeks ago. Additionally the current flies are considerably smaller than R. scolopaceus.

Also there is another species, latipennis that occurs in Germany. In this species the wings are rather broader than the others, and this may be what you have photographed. It is difficult to tell from the angle of the shot.


Of course the wings seem relatively broad to me. I have added another photo more from above.
Edited by Juergen Peters on 01-08-2006 23:15
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Paul Beuk
From my key I understand that both R. strigosus and R. latipennis should have yellowish sides of the thorax, of about the same colour as the femora. In addition, R. latipennis has wings that are only 2.5 times as long as wide. Here it appears to be about 3. So in my opinion, I think it is R. scolopaceus.
Apparently the species is getting scarcer in July and August, but there is even a Danish record from early September. Speculation: It has been hot and dry for quite some time. I have noticed some species that appeared to postpone their emergence until the surroundings became more humid. Maybe the case with your Rhagio's, too?
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
Tony Irwin
The more dorsal view shows that the wings are not so broad, so I agree with Paul that latipennis is unlikely. However, I understand that the thoracic colour of the male strigosus can be grey sometimes, so I'm not certain that this is scolopaceus. There is a difference in the antennal shape, with scolopaceus having a pointed ventral projection, but I cannot tell from the photos exactly what shape they are. If you can get a detailed close-up lateral shot of the head, we may be able to be sure!
Don't worry too much about flight times or size - as Paul says, scolopaceus can fly much later than some books suggest, and small individuals do occur - depending on conditions during development.
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Paul Beuk
My main reason for concern that it may NOT be R. scolopaceus would be the rather darkish impression I get from the specimens. Still, I have not seen that the overall colour of R. strigosus should be darker and that does not fit with the yellowish lateral part of the thorax either...
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
Juergen Peters
Hello Paul and Tony,

many thanks for your explanations!

Tony Irwin wrote:
There is a difference in the antennal shape, with scolopaceus having a pointed ventral projection, but I cannot tell from the photos exactly what shape they are. If you can get a detailed close-up lateral shot of the head, we may be able to be sure!


Unfortunately I have no real lateral shot, the pics below are the best I have taken. I would try to get better photos, but today it is raining all the time :-(.
Edited by Juergen Peters on 02-08-2006 14:59
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Zeegers
I have to agree with Tony.

A much more crucial and better feature than the colouration of pleurae is the length of the third antennal segment. The third antennal segment is definitely short on the picture, unless it is very misleading, that is, shorter than the second. This rules out Rh. scolopaceus.
Moreover, as pointed out by Paul, July is clearly not in favour of scolopaceus.

In latipennis, in males the eyes should be separated, which I don't see on the picture. So in my opinion Juergen was right from the beginning: strigosus.

Theo Zeegers
 
Juergen Peters
Hello, Theo!

Moreover, as pointed out by Paul, July is clearly not in favour of scolopaceus.
In latipennis, in males the eyes should be separated, which I don't see on the picture. So in my opinion Juergen was right from the beginning: strigosus.


Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Juergen Peters
Hello!

Zeegers wrote:
Moreover, as pointed out by Paul, July is clearly not in favour of scolopaceus.


By the way: those flies are still around here in our garden now in mid September (pic from yesterday).
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Rhagionidae, ID please => Rhagio chrysostigma Diptera (adults) 9 17-02-2024 13:00
Rhagionidae: Rhagio cf. cingulatus ♀ Diptera (adults) 4 13-02-2024 11:15
Rhagionidae: Rhagio sp. (R. chrysopilaeformis?) Diptera (adults) 8 08-02-2024 20:29
Rhagionidae, male Rhagio ?conspicuus Diptera (adults) 6 29-01-2024 21:06
Rhagio strigosus? -> R. latipennis ♂ Diptera (adults) 4 28-01-2024 13:21
Date and time
12 July 2025 16:15
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

07.10.22 11:55
Can any1 help out with a pdf copy of 1941 Hammer. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105; thank you

Render time: 1.51 seconds | 196,118,207 unique visits